Application of the Uncertainty Analysis Method to Evaluating the Mechanical Strength of Steam Generator Metal at PWR-based NPPs During Hydraulic Tests and Seismic Loads

  • Алексей [Aleksey] Вадимович [V.] Аванов [Avanov]
  • Юрий [Yuriy] Борисович [B.] Воробьев [Vorobyev]
  • Иван [Ivan] Алексеевич [A.] Никитченко [Nikitchenko]
Keywords: uncertainty analysis, sensitivity analysis, main coolant pipeline, computer codes

Abstract

The problem of using the uncertainty and sensitivity analysis methodology in performing strength analyses is addressed. This matter is relevant for ensuring reliable operation of PWR-based nuclear power facilities. In view of measurement errors and use of empirical models, the computer codes feature some uncertainty. Two loading modes were analyzed: the hydraulic test pressure and seismic impact on a pipeline. The calculations were carried out strictly in compliance with the requirements of the regulatory documentation [enterprise standards (STO) and codes and regulations (NP)] adopted at the Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation. For each of the modes, the obtained stress state and deformations were studied. Based on the calculation results, a distribution close in appearance to a normal one has been obtained, but there are also extreme values that go beyond the normal distribution, which may have the nature of outliers with a low realization probability. A sensitivity analysis for these loading modes is considered. It has been shown that the Poisson's ratio and Young's modulus have the strongest effect. The results obtained may be relevant for cyclic and long-term cyclic strength analyses of pipelines that have long been in operation, for vibration strength analysis, as well as in modeling the pipeline destruction in the analysis of severe accidents.

Information about authors

Алексей [Aleksey] Вадимович [V.] Аванов [Avanov]

Ph.D.-student of Nuclear Power Plants Dept., NRU MPEI, Engineer of the 2nd Category, JSC «Atomenergoproekt», e-mail: AvanovAV@mpei.ru

Юрий [Yuriy] Борисович [B.] Воробьев [Vorobyev]

Ph.D. (Techn.), Assistant Professor of Nuclear Power Plants Dept., NRU MPEI, Leading Researcher of National Research Centre «Kurchatov Institute», e-mail: VorobyevYB@mpei.ru

Иван [Ivan] Алексеевич [A.] Никитченко [Nikitchenko]

Ph.D.-student of Nuclear Power Plants Dept., NRU MPEI, Engineer of the 3rd Category, JSC «NIKIET», e-mail: NikitchenkoIA@mpei.ru

References

1. Чигарев А.В., Кравчук А.С., Смалюк А.Ф. ANSYS для инженеров. М.: Машиностроение-1, 2004.
2. РБ-166—20. Рекомендации по оценке погрешностей и неопределенностей результатов расчетных анализов безопасности атомных станций.
3. Воробьев Ю.Б., Кузнецов В.Д., Мансури М, Оценка влияния неопределённых факторов при анализе аварийных процессов на АЭС с ВВЭР // Теплоэнергетика. 2006. № 9. С. 16—21.
4. Мансури М. Анализ неопределенностей параметров при моделировании динамических процессов в контурах АЭС с ВВЭР: дис. …канд. техн. наук. М.: НИУ «МЭИ», 2005.
5. Воробьев Ю.Б., Кузнецов В.Д. Использование современных интегральных кодов для управления безопасностью АЭС // Вестник МЭИ. 2001. № 5. С. 31—37.
6. Пояснительная записка 320.04.00.00.000 ПЗ. Трубопровод главный циркуляционный. Подольск: ОКБ «Гидропресс», 1979.
7. Mathcad 15.0 [Электрон. ресурс] https://www.mathcad.com/en (дата обращения 11.05.2023).
8. Хмельницкая АЭС. База данных по ЯППУ, 43-923.203.007.БД.02, ред. 1.
9. ПНАЭ Г-7-002—86. Нормы расчета на прочность оборудования и трубопроводов атомных энергетических установок.
10. Технологический регламент по эксплуатации 320.00.00.00.000 Д117. Установка реакторная В320.
---
Для цитирования: Аванов А.В., Воробьев Ю.Б., Никитченко И.А. Применение метода анализа неопределенностей к оценке механической прочности металла парогенератора атомных электрических станций с водо-водяными энергетическими реакторами при гидроиспытаниях и сейсмических нагрузках // Вестник МЭИ. 2024. № 1. С. 103—110. DOI: 10.24160/1993-6982-2024-1-103-110
#
1. Chigarev A.V., Kravchuk A.S., Smalyuk A.F. ANSYS dlya Inzhenerov. M.: Mashinostroenie-1, 2004. (in Russian).
2. RB-166—20. Rekomendatsii po Otsenke Pogreshnostey i Neopredelennostey Rezul'tatov Raschetnykh Analizov Bezopasnosti Atomnykh Stantsiy. (in Russian).
3. Vorob'ev Yu.B., Kuznetsov V.D., Mansuri M, Otsenka Vliyaniya Neopredelennykh Faktorov pri Analize Avariynykh Protsessov na AES s VVER. Teploenergetika. 2006;9:16—21. (in Russian).
4. Mansuri M. Analiz Neopredelennostey Parametrov pri Modelirovanii Dinamicheskikh Protsessov v Konturakh AES s VVER: Dis. …Kand. Tekhn. Nauk. M.: NIU «MEI», 2005. (in Russian).
5. Vorob'ev Yu.B., Kuznetsov V.D. Ispol'zovanie Sovremennykh Integral'nykh Kodov dlya Upravleniya Bezopasnost'yu AES. Vestnik MEI. 2001;5:31—37. (in Russian).
6. Poyasnitel'naya Zapiska 320.04.00.00.000 PZ. Truboprovod Glavnyy Tsirkulyatsionnyy. Podol'sk: OKB «Gidropress», 1979. (in Russian).
7. Mathcad 15.0 [Elektron. Resurs] https://www.mathcad.com/en (Data Obrashcheniya 11.05.2023).
8. Khmel'nitskaya AES. Baza Dannykh po YAPPU, 43-923.203.007.BD.02, Red. 1. (in Russian).
9. PNAE G-7-002—86. Normy Rascheta na Prochnost' Oborudovaniya i Truboprovodov Atomnykh Energeticheskikh Ustanovok. (in Russian).
10. Tekhnologicheskiy Reglament po Ekspluatatsii 320.00.00.00.000 D117. Ustanovka Reaktornaya V320. (in Russian)
---
For citation: Avanov A.V., Vorobyev Yu.B., Nikitchenko I.A. Application of the Uncertainty Analysis Method to Evaluating the Mechanical Strength of Steam Generator Metal at PWR-based NPPs During Hydraulic Tests and Seismic Loads. Bulletin of MPEI. 2024;1:103—110. (in Russian). DOI: 10.24160/1993-6982-2024-1-103-110
Published
2023-10-18
Section
Nuclear Power Plants, Fuel Cycle, Radiation Safety (Technical Sciences) (2.4.9)